Sunday, January 23, 2011

Dhobi Ghat (Mumbai Diaries)

This is a movie that says a lot without talking much. The movie captures Mumbai, its people, their lives, and its collective spirit just like two of its lead characters do.

The artist, Arun, and the documentary filmmaker, Shai, are the observers. Both are shameless voyeurs, which help them produce great works of art. They observe/peep into others’ lives and secret or routine patterns to produce great art. In the process, they undergo catharsis in their own mundane lives… Somehow, Mumbai brings both of them together when they were in their own individual voids.

Munna and Noor are the observed. They do not realize that and therefore, they end being temporary muses for Shai and Arun, respectively. Obviously, your heart goes out for both of them. You root for them throughout the movie even though your intuition tells you about impending tragedies for both.

This is a movie that reveals the interlinks and the interactions between the observer, the observed, and the observation(s). At some points, all three merge. And this provides us with a feast of sounds, sights, and events for what else is there to life in the maximum city.

This is a movie that contains shorter movies and films in it. Sometimes, the shorter films take over and we forget the bigger picture. The movie reveals that shared spaces just like shared times never belong to the people who shared it. Nobody owns those moments in time or space; neither the observer nor the observed. In the movie, there are only two silent constants when and where everything changes: Mumbai and Noor’s/Arun’s elderly neighbour.

This is a movie that shows us slices of life. It enters a whole new genre where very few movies belong: such is life…

5 comments:

Spruha said...

Hi Warrier!

Applause! I never thought of the movie like you did. Now, when I look at it through your words, the movie seems like a piece of art.

Somehow, since Aamir Khan featured in the movie, people assumed it to be at least a commercial-cum-art production.However, it is more of the arthouse thing, nah?

BTW, I am new to your blog, just stumbled upon rather. Nice work, must say!

abhilash warrier said...

Hi Spruha:

Thanks for the compliment. Just put what I felt about the movie's intentions. Yeah, it is more of the arthouse thingy. Something where Naseer would have fit the painter's role had he been younger! :-)

Please read through the blog at your leisure and provide me feedback. :-)

Sowmya said...

Loved the movie....it was a refreshing concept after a long time.....and liked the way you have written a reviw on it.

Anonymous said...

Excellent angle of view Abhilash! Your observations are truely artistic.

But I'm still not sure what does the climax mean? Why did Shai cries in the end? Was she in love with Munna?

Didn't get the point of writer :(

Rgds,
Rakesh

abhilash warrier said...

Sowmya, oh yeah. Truly amazing movie. Loved it completely. Thanks for your compliment.

Rakesh, maybe she realized love from an objective point-of-view.

Maybe, she realized her folly of getting so close to Munna led to his heartbreak.

Maybe such is love... :-)